Helm vs. Kustomize: Which One Fits Your Workflow?

When working with Kubernetes, one of the first challenges is managing YAML manifests at scale. While writing plain YAML works for small setups, real-world clusters quickly outgrow hand-written configurations. That’s where tools like Helm and Kustomize come in — each offering a way to structure, reuse, and manage Kubernetes manifests.

But which one fits your workflow better? Let’s dive deep into the differences, strengths, and real-world use cases of Helm and Kustomize.

What is Helm?

Helm is often called the “package manager for Kubernetes.” It bundles Kubernetes manifests into Charts, which act like reusable templates. A Chart can define Deployments, Services, ConfigMaps, and more, with variables injected via values.yaml.

Key Features:

• Templating engine: Uses Go templates to dynamically generate YAML.
• Chart Hub ecosystem: Thousands of prebuilt charts for databases, monitoring stacks, and more.
• Versioned releases: Helm keeps track of installed versions, making upgrades and rollbacks easy.
• Community standard: Many vendors distribute their apps as Helm charts.

Real-world use case:

You need to deploy Prometheus and Grafana. Instead of writing 20+ YAML files, you can use existing Helm charts, override a few values, and install the whole monitoring stack in minutes.

What is Kustomize?

Kustomize is a Kubernetes-native configuration management tool that comes bundled with kubectl. Instead of templates, Kustomize uses a patch and overlay model to modify base YAML files.

Key Features:

• Base and overlays: Start with a common set of manifests and apply environment-specific overlays (e.g., dev, staging, prod).
• No templating needed: Pure YAML — no Go templates or Helm syntax.
• Native integration: Works directly with kubectl apply -k.
• Focused scope: Simpler and less opinionated than Helm.

Real-world use case:

You maintain a custom in-house microservice with slightly different configurations per environment. Instead of copy-pasting YAML, you create a base manifest and overlay patches (like changing resource limits or replica counts).

Helm vs. Kustomize: A Side-by-Side Comparison

Choosing the Right Tool for Your Workflow

When Helm Shines

• You want to install third-party applications like NGINX Ingress Controller, Prometheus, or ElasticSearch.
• You need versioning and rollbacks for your releases.
• You prefer a packaged, repeatable way to share apps across teams.
• Your team is already familiar with Go templates.

When Kustomize Shines

• You own and maintain custom apps with environment-specific differences.
• You want a lightweight solution without introducing extra tooling.
• You already use GitOps (e.g., ArgoCD, Flux), where Kustomize support is first-class.
• You prefer declarative YAML overlays instead of templating.

Real-World Hybrid Approach

Many teams don’t pick one exclusively — they combine both. For example:

• Use Helm to install third-party apps like databases or monitoring stacks.
• Use Kustomize to manage your in-house applications with environment overlays.
• Use GitOps tools (like ArgoCD) that support both, giving flexibility without lock-in.

Conclusion

There’s no single winner between Helm and Kustomize — it depends on your workflow and team culture. Helm provides a powerful packaging and templating system, ideal for installing complex apps and sharing reusable charts. Kustomize offers a simple, Kubernetes-native way to manage configurations without adding new templating languages.

The best practice for many organizations is to use Helm for third-party apps and Kustomize for internal workloads — leveraging the strengths of both.

Enjoyed this post? Subscribe to NotSoStatic to get more deep dives on Kubernetes, DevOps, and cloud engineering straight to your inbox.